Anaerobic granulation technology for wastewater treatment

 

Anaerobic granulation technology for wastewater treatment

• Adebowale, O. & Kiff, R. 1988 Operational trends in UASB reactor bed stability and during initiation of granulation. In Proceeding of the Fifth International Symposium on Anaerobic Digestion, eds. Tilche, A. & Rozzi, A. pp. 99–103. Italy: Bologna.

• Alphenaar, P.A., Visser, A. & Lettinga, G. 1993 The effect of liquid upflow velocity and hydraulic retention time on granulation in UASB reactors treating wastewater with a high-sulphate content. Bioresources Technology 43, 249–258.

• Alves, M., Cavaleiro, A.J., Ferreira, E.C., Amaral, A.L., Mota, M., da Motta, M., Vivier, H. & Pons, M.N. 2000 Characterization by image analysis of anaerobic sludge under shock conditions. Water Science and Technology 41, 207–214.

• Angenent, L.T. & Sung, S. 2001 Development of anaerobic migrating blanket reactor (AMBR), a novel anaerobic treatment system Water Research 35, 1739–1747.

• Arcand, Y., Guitot, S.R., Desrochers, M. & Chavarie, C. 1994 Impact of the reactor hydrodynamics and organic loading on the size and activity of anaerobic granules. Chemical Engineering Journal and Biochemical Engineering Journal 56, 23–35.

• Arching, B.K., Schmidt, J.E., Winther-Nielsen, M., Macario, A.J.L. & de Macario, E.C. 1993 Effect of medium composition and sludge removal on the production, composition and architecture of thermophilic (55 °C) acetate-utilizing granules from an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 59, 2538–2545.

• Batstone, D.J. & Keller, J. 2001 Variation of bulk properties of anaerobic granules with wastewater type. Water Research 35, 1723–1729.

• Bitton, G. 1999 Wastewater Microbiology. New York: Wiley-Liss.

• Cail, R.G. & Barford, J.P. 1985 The development of granulation in an upflow floc digester and an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket digester treating cane juice stillage. Biotechnology Letters 7, 493–498.

• Cammarota, M.C. & Sant'Anna, G.L. Jr. 1998 metabolic blocking of exopolysaccharides synthesis: effects on microbial adhesion and biofilm accumulation. Biotechnology Letters 20, 1–4.

• Campos, C.M.M. & Anderson, G.K. 1992 The effect of the liquid upflow velocity and the substrate concentration on the start-up and steady state period of lab-scale UASB reactors. Water Science and Technology 25, 41–50.

• Castellanos, T., Ascencio, F. & Bashan, Y. 2000 Starvation-induced changes in the cell surface of Azospirillum. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 33, 1–9.

• Chen, J. & Lun, S.Y. 1993 Study on mechanism of anaerobic sludge granulation in UASB reactors. Water Science and Technology 28, 171–178.

• Chen, S.J., Li, C.T. & Shieh, W.K. 1985 Performance evaluation of the anaerobic fluidized bed system: II. Biomass holdup and characteristics. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology 35, 183–190.

• Costerton, J.W., Irvin, R.T. & Cheng, K.J. 1981 The bacterial glycocalyx in nature and disease. Annual Review of Microbiology 35, 299–324.

• Daffonchio, D., Thavessri, J. & Verstraete, W. 1995 Contact angle measurement and cell hydrophobicity of granular sludge from upflow anaerobic sludge bed reactors. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61, 3676–3680.

• Darnell, J., Lodish, H. & Baltimore, D. 1986 Molecular Cell Biology. New York: Scientific American Books.

• De Zeeuw, W.J. 1984 Acclimatization of anaerobic sludge for UASB reactor start-up. PhD thesis, Agricultural University of Wageningen, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

• De Zeeuw, W.J. 1988 Granular sludge in UASB-reactors. In Granular Ananerobic Sludge: Microbiology and Technology, eds. Lettinga, G., Zehnder, A.J.B., Grotenhuis, J.T.C. & Hulshoff Pol, L.W. pp. 132–145. The Netherlands: Wageningen.

• Draaijer, H., Maas, J.A.W., Schaapman, J.E. & Khan, A. 1992 Performance of the 5 MLD UASB reactor for sewage treatment at Kanpur, India. Water Science and Technology 25, 123–133.

• Driessen, W.J.B.M., Tielbaard, M.H. & Vereijken, T.L.F.M. 1994 Experience on anaerobic treatment of distillery effluent with the UASB process. Water Science and Technology 30, 193–201.

• El-Mamouni, R., Leduc, R. & Guiot, S.R. 1997 Influence of the starting microbial nucleus type on the anaerobic granulation dynamics. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 47, 189–194.

• El-Mamouni, R., Leduc, R. & Guiot, S.R. 1998 Influence of synthetic and natural polymers on the anaerobic granulation process. Water Science and Technology 38, 341–347.

• Fang, H.H.P. & Chui, H.K. 1993 Maximum COD loading capacity in UASB reactors at 37 °C. Journal of Environmental Engineering 119, 103–119.

• Fang, H.H.P. & Lau, I.W.C. 1996 Start-up of thermophilic (55 °C) UASB reactors using different mesophilic seed sludges. Water Science and Technology 34, 445–452.

• Fang, H.H.P., Chui, H.K. & Li, Y.Y. 1995 Effect of degradation kinetics on the microstructure of anaerobic biogranules. Water Science and Technology 32, 165–172.

• Forster, C.F. & Lewin, D.C. 1972 Polymer interaction at activated sludge surfaces. Effluent Water Treatment Journal 12, 520–525.

• Ghangrekar, M.M., Asolekar, S.R., Ranganathan, K.R. & Joshi, S.G. 1996 Experience with UASB reactor start-up under different operation conditions. Water Science and Technology 34, 421–428.

• Grootaerd, H., Liessens, B. & Verstraete, W. 1997 Effects of directly soluble and fibrous rapidly acidifying chemical oxygen demand and reactor liquid surface tension on granulation and sludge-bed stability in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 48, 304–310.

• Grotenhuis, J.T.C., van Lier, J.B., Plugge, C.M., Stams, A.J.M. & Zehnder, A.J.B. 1991 Effect of ethylene glycol-bis(β-aminoethylether)-N,N-tetraacetic acid (EGTA) on stability and activity of methanogenic granular sludge. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 36, 109–114.

• Guiot, S.R., Gorur, S.S., Bourque, D. & Samson, R. 1988 Metal effect on microbial aggregation during upflow anaerobic sludge bed-filter (UBF) reactor start-up. In Granular Anaerobic Sludge: Microbiology and Technology, eds. Lettinga, G., Zehnder, A.J.B., Grotenhuis, J.T.C. & Hulshoff Pol, L.W. pp. 187–194. The Netherlands: Wageningen.

• Guiot, S.R., Pauss, A. & Costerton, J.W. 1992 A structured model of the anaerobic granules consortium. Water Science and Technology 25, 1–10.

• Guwy, A.J., Hawjes, F.R., Wilcox, S.J. & Hawkes, D.L. 1997 Neural network and on-off control of bicarbonate alkalinity in a fluidizedbed anaerobic digester. Water Research 31, 2019–2025.

• Harper, S.R. & Suidan, M.T. 1991 Anaerobic treatment kinetics. Water Science and Technology 24, 61–78.

• Hickey, R.F. 1991 Startup, operation, monitoring and control of highrate anaerobic treatment systems. Water Science and Technology 24, 207–255.

• Hirsch, R. 1984 Microcolony formation and consortia. In Microbial Adhesion and Aggregation, ed. Marshall, K.C. pp. 373–393. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

• Hulshoff Pol, L.W. 1989 The phenomenon of granulation of anaerobic sludge. PhD thesis, Agricultural University of Wageningen, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

• Hulshoff Pol, L.W., de Zeeuw, W.J., Velzebber, C.T.M. & Lettinga, G. 1983 Granulation in UASB-reactors. Water Science and Technology 8/9, 291–304.

• Hulshoff Pol, L.W., Heijnekamp, K. & Lettinga, G. 1988 The selection pressure as a driving force behind the granulation of anaerobic sludge. In Granular Ananerobic Sludge: Microbiology and Technology, eds. Lettinga, G., Zehnder, A.J.B., Grotenhuis, J.T.C. & Hulshoff Pol, L.W. pp. 153–161. The Netherlands: Wageningen.

• Imai, T. 1997 Advanced start up of UASB reactors by adding of water absorbing polymer. Water Science and Technology 36, 399–406.

• Kalogo, Y., Seka, A.M. & Verstraete, W. 2001 Enhancing the start-up of a UASB reactor treating domestic wastewater by adding a water extract of Moringa oleifera seeds. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 55, 664–651.

• Kennedy, K.J. & Lentz, E.M. 2000 Treatment of landfill leachate using sequencing batch and continuous upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (USAB) reactors. Water Research 34, 3640–3656.

• Kosaric, N., Blaszczyk, R., Orphan, L. & Valladares, J. 1990 The characteristics of granules from upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors. Water Research 24, 1473–1477.

• Lens, P., De Beer, D., Cronenberg, C., Ottengraf, S. & Verstraete, W. 1995 The use of microsensors to determine distributions in UASB aggregates. Water Science and Technology 31, 273–280.

• Lepisto, R. & Rintala, J. 1999 Extreme thermophilic (70 °C), VFA-fed UASB reactor: performance, temperature response, load potential and comparison with 35 and 55 °C UASB reactors. Water Research 33, 3162–3170.

• Lettinga, G., van Velsen, A.F.M., Hobma, S.W., de Zeeuw, W. & Klapwijk, A. 1980 Use of the upflow sludge blanket (USB) reactor concept for biological waste water treatment especially for anaerobic treatment. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 22, 699–734.

• Lettinga, G., Hulshoff Pol, L.W., Koster, I.W., Wiegant, W.M., Zeeuw, W.J., de Rinzema, A., Grin, P.C., Roersma, R.E. & Hobma, S.W. 1984 High-rate anaerobic wastewater treatment using the UASB reactor under a wide range of temperature conditions. Biotechnology Genetic Engineering Review 2, 253–284.

• Liu, Y. 1995 Adhesion kinetics of nitrifying bacteria on various thermoplastic supports. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 5, 213–219.

• Liu, Y. & Tay, J.H. 2001 Detachment forces and their influence on the structure and metabolic behavior of biofilms. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 17, 111–117.

• MacLeod, F.A., Guiot, S.R. & Costerton, J.W. 1990 Layered structure of bacterial aggregates produced in an upflow anaerobic sludge bed and filter reactor. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 56, 1598–1607.

• Mahoney, E.M., Varangu, L.K., Cairns, W.L., Kosaric, N. & Murray, R.G.E. 1987 The effect of calcium on microbial aggregation during UASB reactor start-up. Water Science and Technology 19, 249–260.

• Marsilli-Libeli, S. & Muller, A. 1996 Adaptive fuzzy pattern recognition in the anaerobic digestion process. Pattern Recognition Letters 17, 651–659.

• Morgan, J.W., Evison, L.M. & Forster, C.F. 1991 Upflow sludge blanket reactors: the effects of bio-supplements on performance and granulation. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology 52, 243–255.

• Morvai, L., Mihaltz, P. & Czako, L. 1992 The kinetic basis of a new start-up method to ensure the rapid granulation of anaerobic sludge. Water Science and Technology 25, 113–122.

• Noyola, A. & Mereno, G. 1994 Granulation production from raw waste activated sludge. Water Science and Technology 30, 339–346.

• O'Flaherty, V., Lens, P.N., De Beer, D. & Colleran, E. 1997 Effect of feed composition and upflow velocity on aggregate characteristics in anaerobic upflow reactors. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 47, 102–107.

• Palmgren, R., Jorand, F., Nielsen, P.H. & Block, J.C. 1998 Influence of oxygen limitation on the cell surface properties of bacteria from activated sludge. Water Science and Technology 37, 349–352.

• Palns, S.S., Loewenthal, R.E., Dold, P.L. & Marais, G.R. 1987 Hypothesis for pelletisatio in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. Water SA 13, 69–80.

• Papahadjopoulos, D., Nir, S. & Duzgunes, N. 1990 Molecular mechanisms of calcium-induced membrane fusion. Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembrane 22, 157–175.

• Parsegian, V.A. & Rand, R.P. 1991 Forces governing lipid interaction and rearrangement. In Membrane Fusion, eds. Wilschut, J. & Hockstra, D. pp. 65–85. New York: Marcel Dekker.

• Pereboom, J.H.F. & Vereijken, T.L.F.M. 1994 Methanogenic granule development in full scale internal circulation reactors. Water Science and Technology 30, 9–21.

• Qi, S., Dhavises, G., Sriprasetsak, P., Tanaka, T. & Makoto, T. 1985 Methane fermentation of agro-waste and grasses. In Anaerobic Digestion 1985, ed. China State Biogas Association pp. 145–157. China: Guangzhou.

• Quarmby, J. & Forster, C.F. 1995 An examination of the structure of UASB granules. Water Research 29, 2449–2454.

• Ross, W.R. 1984 The phenomenon of sludge pelletization in the anaerobic treatment of a maize processing waste. Water SA 10, 197–204.

• Rouxhet, P.G. & Mozes, N. 1990 Physical chemistry of the interaction between attached microorganisms and their support. Water Science and Technology 22, 1–16.

• Rudd, T., Sterritt, R.M. & Lester, J.N. 1984 Complexation of heavy metals by extracellular polymers in the activated sludge process. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation 56, 1260–1268.

• Sam-Soon, P.A., Looewenthal, R.E., Dold, P.L. & Marais, D.V.R. 1988 Pelletization in upflow anaerobic sludge bed reactors. In: Anaerobic Digestion, eds. Hall, E.R. & Hobson, P.N. pp. 55–60. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.

• Sanchez, J.M., Arijo, S., Munoz, M.A., Morinigo, M.A. & Borrego, J.J. 1994 Microbial colonization of different support materials used to enhance the methanogenic process. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 41, 480–486.

• Schellinkhout, A. & Collazos, C.J. 1992 Full-scale application of the UASB technology for sewage treatment. Water Science and Technology 25, 159–166.

• Schmidt, J.E. & Ahring, B.K. 1993 Effects of magnesium on thermophilic acetate-degrading granules in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 15, 304–310.

• Schmidt, J.E. & Ahring, B.K. 1994 Extracellular polymers in granular sludge from different upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 42, 457–462.

• Schmidt, J.E. & Ahring, B.K. 1996 Granular sludge formation in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 49, 229–246.

• Shen, C.F., Kosaric, N. & Blaszczyk, R. 1993 The effect of selected heavy metals (Ni, Co and Fe) on anaerobic granules and their extracellular polymeric substance (EPS). Water Research 27, 25–33.

• Sierra-Alvarez, R., Hulshoff Pol, L.W. and Lettinga, G. 1988 Start-up of a UASB reactor on a carbohydrate substrate. In Granular Anaerobic Sludge: Microbiology and Technology, eds. Lettinga, G., Zehnder, A.J.B., Grotenhuis, J.T.C. & Hulshoff Pol, L.W. pp. 223–227. The Netherlands: Wageningen.

• Tay, J.H. & Yan, Y.G. 1996 Influence of substrate concentration on micronial selection and granulation during start-up of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors. Water Environment Research 68, 1140–1150.

• Tay, J.H. & Zhang, X.Y. 1999 Neural fuzzy modeling of anaerobic biological wastewater treatment systems. Journal of Environmental Engineering 125, 1149–1159.

• Tay, J.H. & Zhang, X.Y. 2000 A fast predicting neural fuzzy model for high-rate anaerobic wastewater treatment systems. Water Research 34, 2849–2860.

• Tay, J.H., Xu, H.L. & Teo, K.C. 2000 Molecular mechanism of granulation. I: H+ translocation-dehydration theory. Journal of Environmental Engineering 126, 403–410.

• Tay, J.H., Liu, Q.S. & Liu, Y. 2001 Microscopic observation of aerobic granulation in sequential aerobic sludge reactor. Journal of Applied Microbiology 91, 168–175.

• Teo, K.C., Xu, H.L. & Tay, J.H. 2000 Molecular mechanism of granulation. II: Proton translocating activity. Journal of Environmental Engineering 126, 411–418.

• Thaveesri, J., Daffonchio, D., Lessens, B., Vandermeren, P. & Verstraete, W. 1995 Granulation and sludge bed stability in upflow anaerobic sludge bed reactors in relation to surface thermodynamics. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61, 3681–3686.

• Thiele, J.H. & Zeikus, J.G. 1988 Control of interspecies electron flow during anaerobic digestion: the role of formate versus hydrogen transfer during syntrophic methanogenesis inflocs. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 54, 20–29.

• Thiele, J.H., Wu, W.M., Jain, M.K. & Zeikus, J.G. 1990 Ecoengineering high ratebiomathanation system: design of improved syntrophic biomathanation catalysis. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 35, 990–999.

• Vanderhaegen, B., Ysebaert, E., Favere, K., Van Wambeke, M., Peeters, T., Panic, V., Vandenlangenbergh, V. & Verstracte, W. 1992 Acidogenesis in relation to in-reactor granule yield. Water Science and Technology 25, 21–30.

• van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. & Zehnder, A.J.B. 1990 Energetics of bacterial adhesion. Experientia 46, 817–822.

• Vieira, S.M.M. & Garcia, A.D. 1992 Sewage treatment by UASB-reactor: operation results and recommendations for design and utilization. Water Science and Technology 25, 143–157.

• Vieira, S.M.M., Carvalho, J.L., Barijan, F.P.O. & Rech, C.M. 1994 Application of the UASB technology for sewage treatment in a small community at Sumare, Sao Paulo State. Water Science and Technology 30, 203–210.

• Wiegant, W.M. 1986 Thermophilic anaerobic digestion for waste and wastewater treatment. PhD thesis, Agricultural University of Wageningen, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

• Wiegant, W.M. 1988 The Spaghetti theory on anaerobic granular sludge fermentation, or the inevitability of granulation. In Granular Anaerobic Sludge: Microbiology and Technology, eds. Lettinga, G., Zehnder, A.J.B., Grotenhuis, J.T.C. & Hulshoff Pol, L.W. pp. 146–152. The Netherlands: Wageningen.

• Wilschut, J. & Hoekstra, D. 1984 Membrane fusion: from liposome to biological membrane. Trend in Biochemical Science 9, 479–483.

• Wirtz, R.A. & Dague, R.R. 1996 Enhancement of granulation and start-up in anaerobic sequencing batch reactor. Water Environment Research 68, 883–892.

• Wu, W.M. 1991 Technological and microbiological aspects of anaerobic granules. PhD dissertation, Michigan State University, MI, US.

• Wu, W.M., Hu, J.C. & Gu, X.S. 1985 Properties of granular sludge in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor and its formation. In Anaerobic Digestion 1985, ed. China State Biogas Association pp. 339–354. China: Guangzhou.

• Wu, W.M., Hu, J.C., Gu, X.S. & Gu, G.G. 1987 Cultivation of anaerobic granular sludge in UASB reactors with aerobic activated sludge as seed. Water Research 21, 789–799.

• Wu, W.M., Jain, M.K. & Zeikus, J.G. 1996 Formation of fatty acid-degrading anaerobic granules by defined species. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 62, 2037–2044.

• Xu, H.L., Jiao, X.M. & Liu, S.S. 1993 Fluorescence measurement of surface dielectric constant of cell membrane. Acta Biophysica Sinica 9, 234–239.

• Yoda, M., Kitagawa, M. & Miyaji, Y. 1989 Granular sludge formation in the anaerobic expanded micro-carrier process. Water Science and Technology 21, 109–120.

• Yu, H.Q., Tay, J.H. & Fang, H.H.P. 2001 The role of calcium in sludge granulation during UASB reactor start-up. Water Research 35, 1052–1060.

• Zeikus, J.G. 1979 Microbial populations in digesters. In Anaerobic Digestion, ed. Stafford, A.D. pp. 75–103. Cardiff: Scientific Press.

• Zhu, J.R., Hu, J.C. & Gu, X.S. 1997 The bacterial numberation and an observation of a new syntrophic association for granular sludge. Water Science and Technology 36, 133–140.

• Zoutberg, G.R. & de Been, P. 1997 The biobed EGSB (expanded granular sludge bed) system covers shortcoming of the upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor in the chemical industry. Water Science and Technology 35, 183–188.

New Aerobic Granular Sludge Technology…

If you don't want to bring your iPad into the bathroom, we can send you a magazine subscription for free!

Join your colleagues who already get great content delivered right to their inbox.

Want a PDF of this article as it appeared in print?

The first full-scale municipal Nereda aerobic granular sludge technology was installed in Epe, Netherlands. The technology is contained in the circular tanks.

Interested in Instrumentation?

Get Instrumentation articles, news and videos right in your inbox! Sign up now.

Instrumentation + Get Alerts

Companies continue to develop new approaches to basic wastewater treatment processes, always in search of more effective pollutant and nutrient removal with lower costs for energy and other inputs as well as in smaller packages.

Among the latest offerings is the AquaNereda Aerobic Granular Sludge technology, which in commercial application in Europe is under the name Nereda. Aqua-Aerobic Systems is the exclusive provider of Nereda technology developed by Royal HaskoningDHV in the U.S.

The technology consists of a three-phase batch process completed in a single tank. Durable granules composed entirely of biomass do the work of treatment, performing simultaneous nitrification and denitrification for nitrogen removal while also biologically removing phosphorus to low levels without chemical addition. It accomplishes this without mechanical mixing and with closely controlled introduction of air.

Brian Bates, product channel manager for the AquaNereda process, talked about the technology in an interview with Treatment Plant Operator.

TPO: Is this an alternative to conventional activated sludge?

Bates: Yes. The microbiology is very similar to that found in an activated sludge system. However, the biology is primarily found in granules. Rather than relying on a flocculated sludge, which is a loosely mixed microbial community, the granules are layered microbial communities. Within each granule, you have aerobic, anoxic and anaerobic zones. Basically, each granule is a miniature treatment plant. The granules are created automatically by the conditions created in the AquaNereda reactor.

TPO: Is this process preceded by primary treatment?

Bates: It doesn’t have to be, but it can be — similar to conventional activated sludge. We have some applications that follow primary treatment, but most plants thus far are fed with raw influent. The process stream has grit removal and screening, just as it would in a conventional system. Sometimes, depending on the plant design, we need a buffer tank.

TPO: After the preliminary steps, how does the process begin?
Bates: Everything is done in one tank. The first step is a simultaneous fill from the bottom of the tank and a draw from the top. The raw wastewater is a rich carbon source, and at the granules there is a high food-to-mass ratio. Phosphorus release occurs because of the anaerobic conditions there, and the clean effluent is displaced up through the top. No air is introduced in this step; the granules remain settled at the tank bottom.

TPO: What happens after this step?

Bates: The process moves to the react phase. The influent flow is shut off. Air is then added intermittently through fine-bubble diffusers, controlled based on dissolved oxygen, ammonia concentration, or both. Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification occur because of the different discrete zones within the granules.

TPO: At this point, are the granules held in suspension?

Bates: Yes. However, the level of mixing varies throughout the cycle. Sometimes, we achieve a complete mix of the granules, but this is not necessary throughout the entire reaction phase. The aim is to move the bulk liquid around the granules.

TPO: What happens after the react phase?

Bates: The process advances to the settle phase. The granules separate from the treated water. Rapid settling allows more time to be spent in the react phase, and that enables the use of small reactor volumes while achieving ultralow enhanced biological nutrient removal. During the settle phase, a small amount of sludge is wasted out of the system. After that, the process reverts to the first step.

TPO: What effluent conditions can this system produce?

Bates: We typically guarantee 10 mg/L for BOD and TSS. We can achieve as low as 3 mg/L total nitrogen and less than 1 mg/L total phosphorus with no chemical addition. With chemical addition, we can get phosphorus down to approximately 0.5 mg/L, and with tertiary filtration, we can go lower.

TPO: Is this process typically followed by tertiary filtration?
Bates: Not necessarily. The need for filters is based on the effluent requirements. If effluent TSS of less than 10 mg/L is needed, a filter would be required.

TPO: What is the nature of the granules used in this process?

Bates: The granules in aerobic granular sludge are truly a biomass — there is no carrier in them. Everything is formed by the biology we select to create extracellular polymeric substances. These EPSs act as the glue, creating extremely robust granules that can handle many adverse conditions in the system. There has never been a case of de-granulation in an operating facility.

TPO: What specific advantages does this process have over conventional activated sludge?

Bates: It has a 75 percent smaller footprint compared to a five-stage biological nutrient removal process. It roughly doubles the mixed liquor suspended solids, to about 8,000 mg/L. Due to the batch nature of the process, you save on final clarifiers. The energy savings are also significant: energy savings of 30 to 50 percent compared to conventional systems have been achieved.

TPO: Can this process be retrofitted to an existing plant?

Bates: It’s great in retrofit applications. We can retrofit to essentially any basin geometry. Since all processes occur in a single tank, plants that have secondary clarifiers can have their aeration tanks retrofitted with the AquaNereda process and their clarifiers can be converted to other purposes, such as equalization basins or sludge basins. In the process, the MLSS is increased significantly, enabling more flow through the same system while saving on chemicals and energy. As an added bonus, nutrient removal is typically improved.

TPO: Is there a sweet spot in terms of system size?

Bates: We typically look for flows greater than 100,000 gpd. Above that, the sky is the limit. One plant in Ireland has a maximum flow of 314 mgd.

TPO: What is the status of installations of this technology?

Bates: There are around 40 installations worldwide that are in operation or under construction design with flows ranging from 100,000 gpd to over 300 mgd. In the United States, we have many plants under design with some in the detailed design stage. In addition, Aqua-Aerobic Systems is currently constructing an AquaNereda plant at the wastewater treatment plant in Rockford, Illinois, that will serve as a site for customers who would like to see the technology. It’s also for research and development to help determine how far we can push this process and possibly come up with novel ways to use it.

source